450. 책 <하늘거울>의 영감으로 쓴 시 – 천문, 마누스, 311,040,000 years 관련 (6-6)
450-30 450-31 An observer at Giza at epoch c.10,500 BC.When the vernal point is on the rise due east, the prime meridian loopsdirectly overhead and passes through the north celestial pole, the pole of theecliptic and the star Zeta Orionis in Orion’s belt.기원전 10,500년에기자의 관찰자.월경이 동쪽에 있을 때 본초 자오선은 바로 머리 위에 환상에 휘말리면서 북의 천체 기둥, 황록의 기둥, 그리고 오리온 벨트의 별 제타 오리온을 통과합니다.
Figure 2. Analysis of the circular zodiac.S.A. Mackey believed that, as well as representing an antiquity of about 16,000years, the Dendera zodiacs also represented a far greater antiquity.He arguedthat the rectangular zodiac represents the earth’s poles in the plane of theecliptic(i.e.a tilt of 90), which last occurred over 400,000 years ago, andthat the circular zodiac represents the earth’s poles coinciding with theecliptic poles(i.e.a tilt of 180 or 0), which last occurred over 540,000years earlier, when the earth’s axis was inverted.He also says that thezodiacs have features indicating that these positions of the poles had been repeatedthree times-a reference to the depictions of Leo and Virgo. The zodiacstherefore represented an antiquity of some 3.5 million years, during which timethe earth’s poles had been’three times within the plane of the ecliptic’.Itis interesting to note that, as well as referring to Mackey as the Oedipus whohad understood the riddle of the zodiacs, HP Blavatsky also commented:’Onthe Dendera Zodiac as preserved by the modern Egyptian Coptic and Greek adepts, and explained a little differently by Mackey .. .’Denderafull.jpg Figure 3.The circular zodiac of Dendera.(from Bentley, 1825, plate VIII)The circularzodiac contains two Lions. In one of them the Lion’s tail is turned up over itsback(no. 65, but shown more clearly in figure 1, which is more accurate), indicating according to Mackey that the Lion(and every other constellation)had become inverted. In the other, the Lion’s tail curves downward(no. 46).Inthe rectangular zodiac, the Lion’s tail likewise curves downward at an angle of40 to 50(figure 4, no. 61).27. 27. Matter, as such, has no power in any directionwhatever:14 neither attraction of cohesion, nor attraction of gravitation;norpropulsion. It is in itself inert in all particulars.14. This belief was alsoheld by Tesla who may still be proved correct since science has yet to discoverwhat causes gravity.MHJ 23. In the beginning of the earth’s vortex, thecurrent concentrated certain substances(which will be described later)in thecenter, where by friction, the vortex manifested in heat, so that when thecongregation of materials of the earth’s substance were together, they were asa molten mass of fire.13 13.”Three dimensional hydrodynamic{laws thatgovern the motion of line vortices}calculations of protoplanetary disks showthat giant gaseous protoplanets can form with locally isothermal or adiabaticdisk thermodynamics···forming giant planets with modest cores of ice and rockfaster than the core accretion mechanism can.”Science 6/20/97 page 1836″Magnetic and fields and currents can concentrate matter energy far fasterand more effectively than can gravity”Eric Lerner, page 44,”The BigBang Never Happened””Generally in science when two differentphenomena obey the same or very similar mathematical laws, it means that in allprobability they are somehow related. Thus it seems likely that bothelectromagnetism and quantum phenomena generally may be connected to some sortof hydrodynamics<laws that govern the motion of line vortices}on amicroscopic level.the idea that particles formed from vortices in some fluidis certainly worth investigating.”The fluid being what is now called thezero point quantum fluctuation,a Lorentz invariant ether.34. Were the sunplanet extinct, the master vortex would instantly make another sun. As thelines of vortexia are in currents from the outer toward the interior, so do thesolutions of matter take the shape of needles, , in the master, pointing towardthe center, 19 in which condition of things is called LIGHT;20 and when these needlesapproach the center, or even the photosphere, the actinic force is calledHEAT.21 19. This statement resembles the theory mentioned in”Dark Nebula, Globules and Protostars”page 801&802, The polarization of thecounterglow is surprising, Pure{i.e.180?backscattering from randomly orientedirregular, amorphous or spherical particles should give zero polarization. Theexistence of a marked polarization effect in our observations impliesscattering by elongated preferentially oriented particles.Needle likeparticles are possible,… 그렇긴 One is tempted to think of a magnetic field as thearranging agency.””Tapping the Zero-point Energy”by Moray B.King]”… 그렇긴 until 1949 no one expected the light of distant stars wouldbecome polarized… To produce interstellar polarization in the light ofdistant stars requires not only a preponderance of somewhat elongated particlesin interstellar space, but further, some powerful mechanism to align thesep
